Newsweek had an article last Wednesday (I know ... I am
behind) about the budding niche dating network industry. It makes sense
to organize people based around their interested to further community
continuity and increase the chances of finding like-minded partners. My
friend Scott Heifermann of Meetup.com sets it pretty straight when he says
people should use the internet to get off the internet. It makes sense to
me, but it also hints at something a little darker.
My fear is that as we use nice site and networks that we will simply put on
blinder to outside opinion and ideas. As we exist in a closed world with
similar minded friends are we creating a large collection of echo-chambers and
eradicating discussion and discourse? As our country and even the world
polarizes more each day is it such a good idea to shut out thoughts and
opinions that differ from your own? I think healthy discussion and
confrontation will heal us all as long as we are willing and open to new ideas
and opinions. Our current political crisis is a perfect example of what
happens when you create an echo-chamber around your specific views of the world.
powered by performancing firefox
Is there a difference in your mind between politicians who try to find the safe middle and politicians (and their supporters) who are open to colaboration and discussion with people they disagree with?
Posted by: Emmett O'Connell | August 03, 2006 at 09:43 AM
The disturbing challenge is that politicians condition us into the ‘us vs. them’ mentality and in return we demand a combative nature in politics. The other party is the enemy, and their views are fundamentally wrong – unable to reconcile or compromise. The fringe politicos want polarization for the purpose of constituent retention. That and being a moderate is hard work – you have to compromise, and participate in a give and take. If you are a fringe element you stand on your platform and proclaim anyone that does not agree with you as wrong which generates less work for you, bolsters your status as a stand up politician who stick to his guns, and completely stalls forward progress. Fringe politics is lazy, polarizing, and ineffective only benefiting the politico who have pulled the wool over our eyes.
Posted by: Randy | August 03, 2006 at 12:07 PM
Man, I like you. And since it all started over here, I'm going to respond here, rather than have two conversations. But, folks can check out my blog post (http://olywa.blogspot.com/2006/07/danger-of-echo-chambers.html) if they feel like it.
Doesn't that kind of Fringe vs. Fringe politics disengage people from the political process? Instead of stiring the pot (as you would assume it would if they engaged each other), it keeps people from listening as they yell across the chasm at each other.
That, and how campaigns happen now adays, seem to push people not to participate. What can be done to change this trend?
Posted by: Emmett O'Connell | August 03, 2006 at 12:21 PM
Fringe v. fringe is the absolute best way to grind things to a halt, widen the chasm, and ensure that on the rare points of convergence (education) nothing will get accomplished because there needs to be a complete impasse by design. Since no one likes to cheer for a loosing franchise the average fans disappear- leaving only the nutcases that pint their bodies in Buffalo in December! Voter turnout is what ... 35% and it is the middle of the bell curve that feels that there is just no place for them - no one is addressing their bushel of needs. We have managed to disenfranchise 60%+ of the country by focusing our entire political platform on insignificant issues such as homosexuality, online pornography, and interstate abortion. The tragedy is that key things like environment (everyone wants a clean planet), education (everyone wants smart kids), and economics (we all want a strong and steady economy) get pushed out of the way.
Change will come when a few brave souls say enough and try to win on defined centerist policy that encourgae individual freedoms, personal responsibility, social justice, and a global partnership in society and economy. Don't hold your breath!
Posted by: Randy | August 03, 2006 at 02:38 PM
Holy cats dude, check this out:
http://www.sacktheparties.org.uk/
A very different system, but a basic principal. That the power bases at the party level has taken away accountability to local communities.
Posted by: Emmett O'Connell | August 04, 2006 at 12:19 AM